As inflation continues to moderate and the employment picture weakens – markets are trying to gauge just how much the central bank will move. A 25 basis point (bps) cut for September is now a 100% probability according to CME Group’s FedWatch tool. There’s a 63.5% chance of a 25 bps cut; and 36.5% of a 50 bps cut. Markets clearly want 50 bps… but they also know that very rarely is there just “only one rate cut”. This post explores the relationship between debt growth (across all sectors) and the overall trend for interest rates. It’s a relationship which is not often discussed – but would be remiss of investors to ignore.
Debt
Actionable market insights delivered to your inbox weekly
Will the Bond Vigilantes Strike Back?
Last weekend Fed Chair Jay Powell gave a rare interview with TV program ’60 Minutes’. Not only did Powell tell people to expect rates to remain higher for longer – he also sent less than subtle warnings to Congress. I quote: “It’s probably time, or past time, to get back to an adult conversation among elected officials about getting the federal government back on a sustainable fiscal path”. Amen. But good luck with that Jay. When asked if this was an urgent problem – Powell said “You could say that it was urgent, yes.” In short, keep a close eye on bond yields – especially the long-end. The market wants them to head lower – much lower – however fiscal recklessness could prove otherwise.
Why Would the Fed Cut?
Last week the market received what it interpreted as a ‘goldilocks’ jobs number. Not too hot. Not too cold. But just right. Non-farm payrolls (NFP) increased by 199,000 in November, according to the BLS. This was around 19,000 higher than market expectations – however not hot enough for the Fed to raise rates this week. As an aside, the Government added 49K jobs as part of the 199K (inline with their monthly average). The unemployment rate, meanwhile, fell to 3.7% from 3.9%, marking the longest stretch of unemployment below 4% since the 1970s. That’s essentially a full employment picture. So here’s my question – why would the Fed consider cuts at full employment?