Actionable market insights delivered weekly
Categories
AI
Asset Allocation
Big Tech
Books
Bubbles
Charlie Munger
China
Commodities
Consumer Confidence
Consumer Spending
Credit
Cycles
Debt
Discounted Cash Flow
Earnings
Economic Cycles
Employment
Equity Risk Premium
ETFs
Fed Reserve
Finding Value
Forecasting
Generative AI
Geopolicitics
Gold
Geopolicitics
Lessons
Macro/Econ
Magnificent Seven
Geopolicitics
Monetary Policy
Money Supply
Nvidia
oil
Precious Metals
Property
Quantitative Easing
Rates & Bonds
Real GDP
Real PCE
Recession
Retail Sales
Risk
S&P500
Sahms Rule
Soft Landing
Stocks
Tariffs
Trade
Trump
US 10-Year Yield
Valuations
VIX
Warren Buffett
Yield Curve
A Different Lens on the ‘AI Bubble’
25 years ago Cisco (CSCO) was the largest company on the S&P 500 by market cap. Its shares soared on the demand for networking equipment. But it didn’t last. The stock lost 89% of its value in two years. Nvidia is not only charting a very similar technical pattern to CSCO – there are also similarities with valuation metrics. Both the price-to-earnings ratio and price-to-sales multiples have been very similar. What we don’t know (or cannot know) is whether the same fate lies ahead for NVDA (as investors pay a staggering 35x sales for a slice of the AI pie)
Are Semi’s Set to Cool their Gen-AI Heels?
Whilst the technology sector is outperforming the benchmark index this year — semiconductor stocks have done the bulk of the heavy lifting. And it’s not difficult to explain investor FOMO. It’s entirely due to the hype around “AI” and specifically something called “Generative AI”. For example, in a report by Grand View Research, they valued Gen-AI at ~$13B last year. However, its anticipated CAGR is estimated to be ~36% – which puts the industry hitting $109B by 2030. That’s a sharp ramp higher from basically zero two years ago. And today – there a very few chipmakers who produce the GPUs required to meet the insatiable demand. However, is the demand semis are seeing today (and revenue) sustainable long-term? That’s unlikely.
It’s Not If “Long & Variable Lags” Hit… It’s When
Milton Friedman coined the expression “monetary policy operates with long and variable lags”. In the 1970s – he felt it was up to around two years before those effects are felt. Today it’s believed to be sooner – given open transparency of Fed speak and data tools available. But is it? It’s been two years since the Fed’s first hike and we’re just starting to see labor markets soften and consumer demand weaken. Have the full effects of tighter policy been absorbed? I don’t think so.
Apple: Ready to Take Another Bite?
Apple is ~15% off its all time high as it lags its large cap peers. Concerns of iPhone growth and China have rattled investors. However, it’s not unusual for this stock to pull back. Since 2107, we have seen 11 retraces – offering patient investors buying opportunity. From my lens, Apple is a reasonable long-term buy around $165. And if you can get it cheaper – add to it. Over the next 3 years – I think it will be well over $200 as earnings top $8.00 per share.