Category Risk

When the Laws of Probability are Forgotten

Whilst the S&P 500 posted a negative week - it was a strong month for equities. The world's largest Index managed to add 4.8% for the month - hitting an intra-month record high of 5339. That's four of five winning months to start 2024. Perhaps completely enamored by all things AI (more on this in my conclusion) - investors basically shrugged off sharply higher yields and a series of disappointing inflation prints to push prices higher. What could go wrong? At the end of every month - it pays to extend our time horizon to the (less noisy) monthly chart. And whilst the weekly chart is useful - it tends to whip around. Longer-term trends (and perhaps investments) are often better examined using this lens.

Is the Market “Euphoric”?

It's that time of year... where "Sell in May and Go Away" makes its typically annual appearance. Personally I don't give it much weight... basically none. Who invests with the timeframe a few months? Not many that consistently make money. But therein lies the rub - this saying is only relevant as a function of how you choose to invest. Your time horizons are likely very different to mine. This post will offer background where the adage comes from. From there, I will try and answer the question of whether the market is "euphoric". And finally, I'll share some names that I've been adding to.... it's not NVDA.

Are These Recession Indicators Broken?

At the conclusion of their July 26 '23, meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) voted to raise the target range of the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 5.25% to 5.50%. The S&P 500 traded around 4,000 points at the time - some 16% off its ~4800 January high. Markets had reason to be worried... Investors had not seen the Fed this aggressive at any time in the past 40 years... and conditions seemed ripe for a recession. What's more, most widely cited indicators suggested this was a likely outcome. However, it didn't happen? Why not? Are popular recession indicators no longer relevant?

Risk vs Reward

Warren Buffett once told us "the stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient”. Which one are you? And while it sounds cliché, the power of patience is real. We need patience for two things: (i) allow our existing investments to work over time; and also (b) if buying, waiting for prices to come to us (eliminating FOMO). For example, some investors may have felt left out the past three months (I certainly did) - as 'hot' momentum stocks like Nvidia, Netflix, Meta and others surged. Fundamentals were not front of mind - where investors thought nothing of paying 40x plus earnings. The momentum trade had taken hold. But as we know - things inevitably revert to the mean.

Mean Reversion: Index Risks & the ‘M7’

In the game of asset speculation – mean reversion suggests that over time an asset will eventually return to its average price if it drifts or spikes too far from that average level. If applied, it can often help you avoid paying too much. My thinking is the S&P 500 has now drifted too far from the longer-term mean. History has always told us that inevitably prices will mean revert. This post explores the potential risks to investors if simply choosing to passively invest via the benchmark Index. Look no further than the so-called "Mag 7" - which constitute more than a 30% weight.

Will Earnings Deliver on the Hype?

Q4 2023 earnings are starting to hit the tape. From mine, if the market is to continue rallying - it's less about inflation and the Fed - it's whether corporate America will deliver on 12% earnings growth in 2024. Coming into earning's season - my view 12% felt ambitious - given the slowing economy and relative health of the consumer. This post talks more to the concentration in the market - the relative influence from NVDA - and why diversification will be key this year.

Did We Just Pull 2024’s Gains Forward?

Stocks were already partying into the Fed meeting (up ~12% over 6 weeks) - however when Powell provided his December update on monetary policy - he simply turned up the music. Risk was on. So here's my question - with stocks up an incredible 15% in just 7 weeks - how much of next year's potential gains have been pulled forward? Is it riskier now to buy stocks than it was a few weeks ago? To be clear, stocks are likely to add to their gains before the year is done - however we are now trading close to 20x next years earnings. That's not a bargain.

Why I’m Not Betting on a Soft Landing

With the Fed seemingly on pause and bond yields sharply off their highs - markets are optimistic. Equities have surged the past few weeks - up around 17.6% year-to-date. The S&P 500 added 10% in just 3 weeks! The narrative (as far as I can tell) is we're headed for "soft landing". But can we be so sure? Past experience suggests a "hard landing" is the more likely outcome. And absent other evidence, when the Fed hikes this much (and especially this fast) - we should expect one.

Fed Warns, Stocks Shrug

"We still have a long way to go" - that was the not-so subtle warning from Jay Powell this week. After what many felt was a slightly less hawkish Fed Chair last week - sparking an equity rally - Powell attempted to adjust his tone at an IMF event. Was he successful? That's hard to say - as equities seemed to shrug off any warning from the Fed - surging ahead to be up 15% year-to-date. Here's my question: are investors being too sanguine about what's still unknown?

The Battle-lines are Drawn

Here's today's question: do you think 18.3x forward earnings is a good risk/reward bet? For me, the answer is no. And I say this because investors have a very compelling alternative. We don't need to look any further than bond yields. For example, the 12-month US treasury yield offers investors 5.45%