Actionable market insights delivered weekly
Categories
AI
Asset Allocation
Big Tech
Books
Bubbles
Charlie Munger
China
Commodities
Consumer Confidence
Consumer Spending
Credit
Cycles
Debt
Discounted Cash Flow
Earnings
Economic Cycles
Employment
Equity Risk Premium
ETFs
Fed Reserve
Finding Value
Forecasting
Generative AI
Geopolicitics
Gold
Geopolicitics
Lessons
Macro/Econ
Magnificent Seven
Geopolicitics
Monetary Policy
Money Supply
Nvidia
oil
Precious Metals
Property
Quantitative Easing
Rates & Bonds
Real GDP
Real PCE
Recession
Retail Sales
Risk
S&P500
Sahms Rule
Soft Landing
Stocks
Tariffs
Trade
Trump
US 10-Year Yield
Valuations
VIX
Warren Buffett
Yield Curve
Is the Market “Euphoric”?
It’s that time of year… where “Sell in May and Go Away” makes its typically annual appearance. Personally I don’t give it much weight… basically none. Who invests with the timeframe a few months? Not many that consistently make money. But therein lies the rub – this saying is only relevant as a function of how you choose to invest. Your time horizons are likely very different to mine. This post will offer background where the adage comes from. From there, I will try and answer the question of whether the market is “euphoric”. And finally, I’ll share some names that I’ve been adding to…. it’s not NVDA.
Nvidia Can’t Stop Stocks Wobbling
What we’ve seen from Nvidia the past 18 months reminds me of Cisco in the late 1990’s. I wrote about this recently… not much has changed. The path of earnings and the share price have been similar. NVDA’s revenues are up over 2.5x on a YoY basis, causing EPS to be up over 4x over the same period. 18% EPS growth in a single quarter is very impressive but here’s my question… will we see that in 2 or 3 years from now? We didn’t from CSCO – it collapsed. Time will be the judge of that…. not me. Despite the expected “beat and raise” from the AI chip maker – the rest of the market fell sharply. Without NVDA’s ~9% share price gain – the S&P 500 would have been down 1.5% for the day. That tells us how narrow this market is – extremely dependent on stellar earnings from a handful of companies like NVDA. That’s not a healthy setup.
Are These Recession Indicators Broken?
At the conclusion of their July 26 ’23, meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) voted to raise the target range of the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 5.25% to 5.50%. The S&P 500 traded around 4,000 points at the time – some 16% off its ~4800 January high. Markets had reason to be worried… Investors had not seen the Fed this aggressive at any time in the past 40 years… and conditions seemed ripe for a recession. What’s more, most widely cited indicators suggested this was a likely outcome. However, it didn’t happen? Why not? Are popular recession indicators no longer relevant?
“Heads I Win and Tails You Lose”
After almost three decades at this game – something you learn is not to fight the tape. Trade against momentum at your own peril. Consider the news today… it was both bad and good. I will start with the (perceived) ‘good’. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) was slightly cooler than expected. And whilst it’s still a long way above the Fed’s target of 2.0% – the market was thrilled it was only up 0.3% MoM and 3.4% YoY. Bond yields plunged and stocks ripped. Sure… 3.4% isn’t great… but that’s Main Street’s problem… Wall Street doesn’t care. However, the bad news was retail sales plunged. But wait a minute – that’s also “good news” – as it could mean a more accommodative Fed. Heads I win and tails you lose.