Actionable market insights delivered weekly
Categories
AI
Asset Allocation
Big Tech
Books
Bubbles
Charlie Munger
China
Commodities
Consumer Confidence
Consumer Spending
Credit
Cycles
Debt
Discounted Cash Flow
Earnings
Economic Cycles
Employment
Equity Risk Premium
ETFs
Fed Reserve
Finding Value
Forecasting
Generative AI
Geopolicitics
Gold
Geopolicitics
Lessons
Macro/Econ
Magnificent Seven
Geopolicitics
Monetary Policy
Money Supply
Nvidia
oil
Precious Metals
Property
Quantitative Easing
Rates & Bonds
Real GDP
Real PCE
Recession
Retail Sales
Risk
S&P500
Sahms Rule
Soft Landing
Stocks
Tariffs
Trade
Trump
US 10-Year Yield
Valuations
VIX
Warren Buffett
Yield Curve
Markets Expect only 3 Rate Cuts this Year – as Services Inflation Jumps
Expectations for rate cuts this year are coming down. For e.g., one month ago the market saw at least six rate cuts before the end of the year (possibly seven). I challenged that assumption – thinking three was more likely (not six). Following news of a hotter than expected Producer Price Inflation (PPI) print for January – those expectations are now down to just three cuts before year’s end. That’s more aligned to the Fed’s intended path.
Traders: Forget “6 Rate Cuts” for ’24
The much awaited January Consumer Price Index (CPI) came in hotter than expected – leading to a small sell off in equities (2%) and a jump in bond yields. The US 10-year pushed 4.30%. But the data should not have been a surprise – there are pockets of strong inflation (eg car insurance up 24% YoY). From mine there are two takeaways: (i) don’t expect the Fed to cut “6 times” this year (as I’ve been saying); and (ii) inflation is not coming down as quickly as many assumed. The good news is the direction for inflation is lower – however the Fed may be forced to hold rates higher for longer. The question then is how will that impact middle-to-lower income earnings – who are already struggling? And what does that do for earnings?
Mean Reversion: Index Risks & the ‘M7’
In the game of asset speculation – mean reversion suggests that over time an asset will eventually return to its average price if it drifts or spikes too far from that average level. If applied, it can often help you avoid paying too much. My thinking is the S&P 500 has now drifted too far from the longer-term mean. History has always told us that inevitably prices will mean revert. This post explores the potential risks to investors if simply choosing to passively invest via the benchmark Index. Look no further than the so-called “Mag 7” – which constitute more than a 30% weight.
Three Cheers for 5,000!
This week the S&P 500 closed above 5,000 for the first time. Another milestone as we climb the ‘wall of worry’. Over the past 100+ years the S&P 500 has averaged capital gains of ~8.5% per year plus dividends of ~2.0%. That’s a total return of close to 10.5% (on average). If you compound 10.5% per year over 20 years (i.e., ‘CAGR’) – that’s a 637% increase. But as we know, the pathway is rarely smooth. Some years the market may “add 20%” and others it could give back a similar margin (or worse). And we saw this happen recently. However over the long run – markets will rise more often than they fall.