Category S&P500

The Tariff Trap: Navigating Market Uncertainty and the Folly of Forecasting The Tariff Trap: Navigating Market Uncertainty and the Folly of Forecasting

The Tariff Trap: Navigating Market Uncertainty and the Folly of Forecasting

Approx 2 months ago - it felt like markets were starting to hedge their bets. How could I tell? Whilst the market was trading near record highs (around 6100) - momentum was fading. I commented on both the weekly MACD and RSI falling - whilst prices remained high. Technicians call this "negative divergence". Quite often it suggests prices are at greater risk of easing. Since then they've dropped ~6%. The week ending March 7th was the worst week for the year and the third straight week of losses... more to come? I think so...

Market Volatility vs. True Panic: How to Use the VIX to Identify Peak Fear Market Volatility vs. True Panic: How to Use the VIX to Identify Peak Fear

Market Volatility vs. True Panic: How to Use the VIX to Identify Peak Fear

Are markets panicking? That depends on who you ask. A short-term trader might see the ~6% move lower as significant. On the other hand, those who invest for longer-term (such as myself) see a ~6% move down as nothing at all. From mine, panic isn't here yet. However, there is a measure which can help us identify when markets are overly fearful. And generally - they are great buying opportunities. But we are not there yet.

The Limits of Multiple Expansion: Why Price Appreciation Must Eventually Follow Earnings The Limits of Multiple Expansion: Why Price Appreciation Must Eventually Follow Earnings

The Limits of Multiple Expansion: Why Price Appreciation Must Eventually Follow Earnings

Earnings per share growth has averaged 8.3% pa from 2015 through today. However, capital appreciation in stocks (exclduing dividends) has seen a CAGR of 11.0% over the same 10-year period. This divergence is widening which indicates multiple expansion. From mine, investors should be braced for mean reversion.

The Rules of Engagement: Navigating Market Uncertainty and the Tariff Tug-of-War The Rules of Engagement: Navigating Market Uncertainty and the Tariff Tug-of-War

The Rules of Engagement: Navigating Market Uncertainty and the Tariff Tug-of-War

As an investor - it's very important to know the rules. For example, if the rules are constantly influx - it leads to uncertainty. With heightened uncertainty - you pull back. That's what faces investors. For example, consider the following: (i) direction of monetary policy (e.g., as Powell raised concerns on inflation); (ii) A torrent of policy shifts from the White House; and (iii) major disruption with artificial intelligence - as investors question return on capital invested. Uncertainty in each of these buckets makes it hard to commit to stocks with conviction.

Credit Cycles and Market Psychology: Navigating the Impact of Interest Rates on Long-Term Value Credit Cycles and Market Psychology: Navigating the Impact of Interest Rates on Long-Term Value

Credit Cycles and Market Psychology: Navigating the Impact of Interest Rates on Long-Term Value

If you needed reminding the market remains closely tethered to monetary policy - we received it this week. Stocks surged on the back of two things: (i) CPI coming in slightly better than expectations; and (ii) the prospect of the Fed having more room to ease rates. Bond yields dropped and stocks jumped. There's nothing quite like the sniff of cheaper money to get the animal spirits moving. However, it's still far too premature to jump to conclusions.

Why Bond Yields and Inflation are Challenging the Rate Cut Narrative Why Bond Yields and Inflation are Challenging the Rate Cut Narrative

Why Bond Yields and Inflation are Challenging the Rate Cut Narrative

A few months ago Jay Powell claimed victory. Last Sept he said words to the effect of "the time has come to start easing rates". He initially cut rates by 50 points - followed by two more cuts of 25 basis points. Markets were thrilled at the thought of more cheap money - pricing in as many as 6 or 7 rate cuts over the next 12 months. However, at the time I asked why the need to cut? The data simply didn't support it. Jobs were fine. The economy was growing. Inflation was not yet at its desired level. Why cut? However, whilst the Fed was busy running a victory lap - the bond market was less convinced. The US 10-year yield went the other direction -- and appears likely to retest 5.0% in the next few months. What does this do to valuations?

And The New Year Begins… Slowly

The trading year for 2025 is under way. Markets have worked their way through the so-called Santa Clause Rally. For those less familiar - this refers to a period of trading between the last five trading days of December and the first two trading days of January. This year Santa delivered a fat lump of coal. The market lost ground. So what does that mean for 2025? Absolutely nothing! Don't read anything into it! What's more important is Q4 earnings season... and how company's perform.

2025 – Finding Quality at Reasonable Prices

The S&P 500 recorded a 23.3% gain for 2024. For the first time since 1998 - posted two consecutive years of gains above 20%. Not bad right? Well if we extend our time horizon to include 2022 - the market's CAGR is just 7.2% (below its long-term average of ~8.0% exc dividends) Mmm. Not as good. And over 5 years - the S&P 500 CAGR is is 12.7%; and over 10 years its 12.4%. It's important we measure results over a period of at least 5 years (preferably 10). 2-3 years is a very short amount of time... where all kinds of distortions will happen. But over time - these distortions are always corrected. My point? Things always mean revert... and one should never 'cherry pick' dates to fit a narrative.

NVDA: What Do You Pay for Growth?

2024 will go down as another great year for stocks in the trader's almanack. However, what won't be recorded is just seven stocks comprised ~54% of the S&P 500 total gains (~24% with two trading days remaining). It's a bit like golf - you only need to record the final score - not how you did it. However, the how matters (not just the 'what'). This post will address the question of what to pay for one the most popular stocks today - Nvidia (NVDA). The asking price is $137 at 32x forward earnings. But does that represent great value given its growth assumptions?

Price vs Value

Markets could not be more optimistic about the future. We see it with consumer sentiment, spending and in the stock market. For example, the S&P 500 surged to a new record high 6090 - far exceeding the most bullish of forecasts from 12 months ago. Will analysts be equally bullish about 2025? Post Trump's Nov 5th win - the bulls have found another gear. Trump has painted a compelling vision of a US economic resurgence built on three primary pillars: (i) lower taxes; (ii) sweeping deregulation and government reform; and (iii) an
emphasis on domestic production. Why does this have corporate America very excited?